TRIAD for Conflict and Divorce Resolution
|
TRIADs for conflict resolution are another new concept. In a sense, all
TRIAD communication is conflict resolution and the search for
understanding, insight and unity. Never do three people have the exact
same comprehension but, in a properly functioning TRIAD with empathy and
tolerance, they maintain unity.
Here we are considering a special case in which there is direct conflict
between two parties and the TRIAD is being used to provide objective
monitoring of communication and agreement. All three participants in
the TRIAD are, of course, moderators but in this instance, where a TRIAD
is being used to resolve a conflict between two people, the third
member of the TRIAD is the Primary Moderator. We need to make a distinction between a TRIAD being used for conflict resolution and other methods of conflict resolution such as judging and arbitration. The Primary Moderator is not a judge and has no authority to render or compel a decision, because by the rules of TRIADs we are not permitted to have an 'authority'. A legally binding contract might be negotiated through TRIAD agreement but that is the only way that a TRIAD result would carry legal weight. In arbitration, two parties may agree to abide by the decision of a third. In a TRIAD the two parties may agree to go to arbitration even with the Primary Moderator becoming the arbitrator, but that is then no longer TRIADing. Because TRIAD decisions and opinions are not legally binding, it is not even necessary that one of the aggrieved parties be a member of the TRIAD. It might be a good thing for an estranged couple to sit down with a moderator in a TRIAD, but it may well be the case that one, or both, will not be willing to do so. They both still most likely need support and can find it in separate TRIADs with two other individuals each who are going through, or who have gone through, a similar experience. One difficulty with such TRIAD support groups of the latter type is that they may too closely identify with the problem and lack the maturity to objectively view the problems from the alternative perspective of the 'other side'. However, that is the very point of TRIADs, to try to monitor each other and gain insight because, while empathy is important, reality is essential and it is often easier to see reality in another's situation rather than in one's own. That is the advantage of the TRIAD, if the members are truly committed to seeking the truth, then another is more likely to see objectively something that one is emotionally involved in. The TRIAD is supposed to be an empathy club, not a sympathy club. To return again to the situation where we have a conflict just between two people and a Primary Moderator, it would be well to now examine the TRIAD diagram once again and see how this works. The conflict can be on any subject; a marriage conflict or, even more serious, a divorce agreement are just specific examples. Let us suppose in the following diagram that the conflict is between nodes (parties) A and C. As before, we note that there are three lines of moderation. Mature A and C TRIADers will do well to assure that the lines of communication between the node they are in conflict with and the Primary Moderator, B, are working well. The communication that B is moderating can be C to A:
A may feel that way and, while that may not be accurate, for the time being perhaps you can be tolerant of A's position. Perhaps you could rephrase your response to A in a more kindly or diplomatic manner. Maybe you could restate what A has said so that A can be sure that you correctly understand A's position. For completeness I will state it here, but it should go without saying, that the same type of monitoring is to be done by A in regards to the line of communication between C and B. And it should also be obvious that the B/C line also has two arrows of direction just as does the A/C line diagrammed above. Therefore, in some instances, A may be observing about B's communication to C and in other cases about C's communication to B. In some cases C may be saying that B is letting A 'get away with something', or that A is not fully disclosing something (or the dialog may be by A about the B/C line). This is the nature of free, open and candid dialog and is a part of the process in which truth is found and unity is obtained. In TRIAD conflict resolution it would be a definite sign of maturity, empathy, insight, for either C or A to support or reinforce the other vis-à-vis the other's communication with B. Indeed, both A and C should diligently seek opportunities to do that because it will increase their empathy and unity which is the primary TRIAD purpose along with the search for truth.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment